Justice vs. Doubt: The Case of Ivan the TerribleA suspected Nazi war criminal was freed on a technicality.

From the show

Colliding Truths

When Holocaust survivors identified a retired American autoworker as a sadistic concentration camp guard, his conviction seemed certain. But what happens when the quest for justice clashes with the fallibility of human memory and evidence? This case pits the overwhelming need to punish monstrous crimes against the bedrock legal principle of 'beyond a reasonable doubt'. It reveals the terrifying fragility of a system trying to deliver justice decades after the fact.